For more than a decade, the Explaining History Podcast has helped listeners around the world make sense of modern history. What began in 2012 as a simple experiment—short, accessible episodes explaining major historical events—has grown into a long-running library of carefully researched, thoughtful explorations of the 20th and 21st centuries.

This page introduces new listeners to the podcast, explains what makes it different from other history shows, and offers curated paths into more than a thousand episodes.

If you’re searching for a history podcast that goes deeper than anecdotes or trivia, this is where to begin.

Find out more about the podcast here

  • The Italian Civil War was a war within a war, where the struggle for Italy’s soul shaped its politics, even as the Western Allies’ campaigns in Italy received more attention.

  • NATO’s foundational agreement is collapsing due to Trump’s actions, including threats to withdraw, humiliation of allies, and challenges to its mutual defense principles. Legal barriers exist to withdrawal, but trust in the U.S. security guarantee has eroded. If the U.S. falters, Europe would need heightened defense measures while Russia could be emboldened.

  • Donald Trump’s presidency became the instrument of the Protestant establishment’s final destruction, contrasting with Roosevelt’s class-defining portrait. Trump, unlike Roosevelt, was the son of a Queens developer, signaling a new era of arrival.

  • President Trump’s impeachmentImpeachment Full Description:The constitutional mechanism by which a legislative body levels charges against a government official. It serves as the ultimate political remedy for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” designed to prevent the executive branch from becoming a tyranny. Impeachment is not the removal from office, but the formal accusation (indictment) by the legislature. In the context of the crisis, it represented the reassertion of congressional power against an executive branch that had grown increasingly unaccountable. The process forces the political system to decide whether the President is above the law. Critical Perspective:While designed as a check on power, the process highlights the fragility of democratic institutions. It reveals that the remedy for presidential criminality is fundamentally political, not legal. Consequently, justice often relies on the willingness of the President’s own party to prioritize the constitution over partisan loyalty, a reliance that makes the system vulnerable to factionalism.
    Read more
    in 2019 revealed a pattern of disregarding constitutional norms. The charges of abuse of power and obstruction were rooted in his efforts to leverage military aid against foreign leaders. Trump’s dismissal of the proceedings as a ‘witch hunt’ and his subsequent Senate acquittal underscored his prioritization of personal narrative over institutional duty.

  • The Gallipoli Campaign, a defining moment in World War I, saw over 130,000 soldiers killed. Its meaning varies by nation: to Australians and New Zealanders, it is the birth of national consciousness; to Turks, a myth of victory; and to the British, a symbol of imperial missteps. This article explores how history and memory shape these divergent national stories.

  • The COVID-19 pandemic briefing on April 13, 2020, became a defining moment in presidential communication history. As hospitals in New York faced dire shortages of ventilators and the death toll surpassed 20,000 Americans, President Donald Trump opted for a video montage over delivering essential information. This self-directed production showcased his daily efforts against the pandemic, but critics saw it as a display of self-importance.

  • The Ottoman Empire’s capture of Allied prisoners during WWI was staggering, with estimates between 100,000 and 150,000, while the Allies seized a similar number. These figures make the Ottoman theater one of the major sites of contention for captives.

  • Trump’s early business education taught him one thing – the little people pay their debts back. Trump’s bankruptcies have been a part of a strategy of wealth extraction and this mindset now controls America.

  • The Mandate System and the Voices That Refused to Be Silenced

    In Susan Pedersen’s book *The Guardians*, the colonial mandate systemMandate System Full Description:A mechanism established by the League of Nations after World War I to administer former Ottoman and German territories. “Class A” Mandates—Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, and Transjordan—were considered nearly ready for independence but placed under temporary control of France or Britain until they could “stand alone.” In reality, Mandates were colonies by another name. Critical Perspective:The Mandate System was hypocrisy institutionalized. The same powers that carved up the Middle East for their own advantage claimed they were acting as benevolent trustees. No timetable for independence was set; “readiness” was defined by the mandatory power. Iraq was granted nominal independence in 1932, but with a British client king and treaty that preserved British military bases and oil control. The Mandate was not the road to freedom but the road to neocolonialism.
    Read more
    is explored as a mechanism through which colonized peoples claimed nations’ rights. The narrative reveals how these systems were tools for colonial powers to legitimize territorial claims, yet they were viewed by colonized populations as betrayals of promised self-determinationSelf-Determination Full Description:Self-Determination became the rallying cry for anti-colonial movements worldwide. While enshrined in the UN Charter, its application was initially fiercely contested. Colonial powers argued it did not apply to their imperial possessions, while independence movements used the UN’s own language to demand the end of empire. Critical Perspective:There is a fundamental tension in the UN’s history regarding this term. While the organization theoretically supported freedom, its most powerful members were often actively fighting brutal wars to suppress self-determination movements in their colonies. The realization of this right was not granted by the UN, but seized by colonized peoples through struggle.. This complex legacy highlights the contradictions at the heart of post-war governance.

  • The Caucasus Crucible: The Ottoman-Russian Front and the Birth of Modern Nationalism

    The Ottoman Third Army’s disastrous winter offensive at Sarikamish in 1914 highlighted the brutal realities of the First World War, with 60,000 to 80,000 casualties from harsh conditions. This pivotal battle set the stage for the complex ethnic conflicts that reshaped the Caucasus region.

  • The Mesopotamian Front: From Basra Landing to the Siege of Kut

    The Mesopotamian campaign, often overshadowed by Gallipoli and the Western Front, marked a turning point for both empires. For Britain, it was a catastrophic failure, while the Ottomans capitalized on familiar ground, showcasing their strategic prowess.

  • The Suez Canal Offensive: How the Ottomans Tried to Break the British Lifeline in 1915

    The Ottoman Empire’s bold but ultimately failed assault on the Suez Canal in 1915 revealed the harsh realities of war and exposed its strategic vulnerabilities. This early military operation sought to sever British communications and incite an uprising but highlighted the fragile nature of Ottoman military planning.

  • The Tsushima Scenario: How a Catastrophic Iran War Could Unleash a Domestic Political Revolution

    The looming showdown between the U.S. and Iran is shaping up to be a modern-day Battle of Tsushima, where a decisive defeat could unravel the very fabric of American power and prosperity. As ground troops are deployed, the specter of a catastrophic military failure looms large, threatening to ignite a seismic political crisis that could reshape global dynamics.

  • The Island Trap: Why Kharg Would Become America’s Strategic Graveyard

    Kharg Island, a strategic coral outcrop off Iran’s western coast, plays a pivotal role in Iran’s oil exports, handling 90% of crude oil exports. Seizing it could economically cripple Iran without American troops needing to land. However, history warns against such bold moves—Gallipoli and Dien Bien Phu show the perils of holding fortified positions against asymmetric warfare.

  • The Long Transition: Power, Decline, and the Spectre of Global Conflict

    The Question of Naming History has a way of naming things only after they have concluded. We look back at 1914 and 1939 as definitive starting points, but as we discuss in the latest Explaining History podcast, those living through the current conflagrations in Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, and Venezuela are left wondering: are we already in the midst of a global conflict? And if so, at what point do we give it a name? The historian Richard Overy, in his seminal work Blood and Ruins, suggests that the two World Wars might be viewed as a single, continuous struggle of…

  • Jürgen Habermas (1929–2026): A Critical Appreciation

    Jürgen Habermas, a towering figure in 20th-century philosophy, explored democracy’s essence, emphasizing reasoned discourse over coercion. Born in Düsseldorf, his life’s challenges shaped his views on communication and societal governance.

Follow us to receive new posts via email:

Key History Topics

YouTube History playlists

British History Playlist

Playlist: East European History
Watch this playlist on YouTube

Soviet History Playlist

Playlist: Soviet History
Watch this playlist on YouTube

American History Playlist

Playlist: American History
Watch this playlist on YouTube

German History Playlist

Playlist: German History
Watch this playlist on YouTube