How did a combination of Wilsonian liberal internationalism and British colonial ideas about civilisation intersect with Britain’s objectives in expanding its territories after the First World War? The Mandate systemMandate System Full Description:A mechanism established by the League of Nations after World War I to administer former Ottoman and German territories. “Class A” Mandates—Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, and Transjordan—were considered nearly ready for independence but placed under temporary control of France or Britain until they could “stand alone.” In reality, Mandates were colonies by another name. Critical Perspective:The Mandate System was hypocrisy institutionalized. The same powers that carved up the Middle East for their own advantage claimed they were acting as benevolent trustees. No timetable for independence was set; “readiness” was defined by the mandatory power. Iraq was granted nominal independence in 1932, but with a British client king and treaty that preserved British military bases and oil control. The Mandate was not the road to freedom but the road to neocolonialism.
Read more for administering German and Ottoman colonies was a largely British project, influenced by American internationalism and resented by the French. Explaining History helps you understand the 20th Century through critical conversations and expert interviews. We connect the past to the