1. The Core Claim

Existentialism’s core claim is that human existence precedes essence — there is no pre-given human nature, no divine plan, no historical necessity that determines what we are or should be. We are condemned to be free: to make choices without foundation, to be responsible for what we make of ourselves, and to confront the absurdity of a universe without inherent meaning. Its key texts include Sartre’s Being and Nothingness (1943) and Existentialism is a Humanism (1945), Camus’s The Myth of Sisyphus (1942) and The Rebel (1951), and Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949) and The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947). The philosophical tradition drew on Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Husserl, and Heidegger; its political expression was shaped by the French Resistance and the post-war reckoning with fascism and Stalinism.

2. Origins and Development

Existentialism as a named movement crystallised in occupied and post-liberation Paris. Sartre and de Beauvoir had studied phenomenology in Germany in the 1930s; the Occupation gave their philosophical preoccupations — choice, responsibility, bad faith — immediate political urgency. The question of collaboration versus resistance was literally a question about freedom and authenticity. Sartre’s post-war celebrity — his lectures, plays, and novels reaching a mass audience — made existentialism the dominant intellectual style of the late 1940s and 1950s across Europe and beyond. Camus’s breakaway from Sartre in The Rebel — rejecting Marxist historical teleology as a form of political nihilism — was one of the great intellectual quarrels of the century.

3. Political Application

Existentialism’s political trajectory was contested between its major figures. Sartre moved toward Marxism, arguing in Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960) that existentialism must situate individual freedom within the structural constraints of scarcity and history. He became an apologist for Stalinist violence in ways that de Beauvoir, Camus, and Merleau-Ponty resisted. De Beauvoir deployed existentialist categories — the Other, bad faith, situation — to analyse women’s oppression, founding second-wave feminist theory. Camus’s ‘absurdism’ rejected both capitalism and communism in favour of a political ethic of limits and solidarity.

4. Consequences and Failures

Existentialism’s political record was uneven at best. Sartre’s willingness to subordinate evidence to political commitment — refusing to condemn Soviet labour camps because it might demoralise the French working class — exemplified the bad faith it had theorised. Heidegger’s involvement with Nazism, and the debate about how far his philosophy was implicated in his politics, has shadowed the tradition. The individualist core of existentialism also made sustained collective political organisation difficult: freedom was always the individual’s problem first.

5. Legacy

Existentialism’s direct influence declined after the 1960s, displaced by structuralism and then post-structuralism, but its concerns — freedom, authenticity, bad faith, the Other — migrated into literary theory, feminist philosophy, and political theory. De Beauvoir’s analysis of ‘the Other’ became central to feminist and post-colonial theory. Camus’s political ethics found new readers in each generation confronting totalitarianism. Sartre’s political commitment, however compromised, modelled a kind of intellectual engagement with politics that the professionalisation of academic philosophy has largely abandoned.

6. Key Figures

  • Simone de Beauvoir — existentialist feminism and the foundational analysis of women’s oppression
  • Simone Weil — parallel tradition of radical moral philosophy engaging oppression
  • Hannah Arendt — drew on existentialist phenomenology for political philosophy

7. Historiographical Debates

8. Podcast Episodes

← Back to Ideas

Thank you for subscribing!

Please check your email to confirming your subscription.