Board: AQA | Option: 2Q | Component: Component 2 (Depth Study) | Assessment Objective: AO3
This option covers the United States from Truman’s presidency through to Carter, examining Cold War politics, the promise and limits of post-war prosperity, the civil rights movement, the Great SocietyGreat Society Full Description President Lyndon Johnson’s domestic programme, launched in 1964–65, representing the most ambitious expansion of the American welfare state since the New Deal. The Great Society created Medicare (healthcare for the elderly) and Medicaid (healthcare for the poor), passed the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965), established federal funding for education, created the National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities, and introduced immigration reform that ended the discriminatory national-origins quota system. Critical Perspective The Great Society was undermined almost immediately by the costs of the Vietnam War, which diverted resources and political capital from domestic reform. Johnson’s tragedy — captured in his own private admission that he knew Vietnam would “destroy the Great Society” — is that his most consequential domestic achievements were overshadowed and ultimately curtailed by a foreign policy disaster. The conservative backlash against the Great Society, which began with the 1966 midterms, initiated the rightward shift in American politics that culminated in Reaganism., Vietnam, WatergateWatergate Full Description The political scandal that destroyed the Nixon presidency, beginning with the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate complex in June 1972, ordered by Nixon’s re-election campaign. The subsequent cover-up — which involved obstruction of justice, hush-money payments, and abuse of the CIA and FBI — was exposed through the Washington Post reporting of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein and Senate hearings. Nixon resigned on 9 August 1974, the only US president to do so, after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled he must release incriminating tape recordings. Critical Perspective Watergate is often treated as a story of American democracy functioning — the system worked, Nixon was held accountable. A more sceptical reading notes what Watergate normalised: the assumption that presidents routinely abuse power, that loyalty to the person rather than the constitution defines political survival, and that the question is not whether illegal acts occur but whether they are exposed. The post-Watergate reforms (campaign finance law, the independent counsel statute) were largely dismantled in subsequent decades, suggesting the lessons were not durable., and the social upheavals of the 1960s. Students assess how far post-war America fulfilled its self-image as a land of freedom and opportunity — and how historians have interrogated the gap between the American ideal and American reality.
What this option covers
- Truman and post-war America: the Fair Deal, Korea, and McCarthyismMcCarthyism Full Description The wave of anti-communist suspicion, accusation, and persecution that swept the United States in the late 1940s and early 1950s, associated with Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin. McCarthy claimed — without evidence — that the US government and army were riddled with communist agents. The period saw the blacklisting of suspected communists from Hollywood and academia, loyalty investigations of federal employees, and the destruction of careers through innuendo. McCarthy was finally discredited during the Army-McCarthy hearings of 1954. Critical Perspective McCarthyism has been so thoroughly discredited that it is easy to forget it enjoyed genuine popular support. The fear of Soviet espionage was not entirely irrational — the Rosenbergs had passed nuclear secrets to the Soviets, and Soviet intelligence had penetrated the US government. McCarthy exploited a real anxiety for political purposes, but the mechanisms he used — guilt by association, demands for loyalty oaths, the destruction of careers without due process — were symptoms of a democratic culture that had partially suspended its own principles in the face of perceived existential threat.
- Eisenhower: Cold War consensus, the military-industrial complexMilitary-Industrial Complex A term popularized by Dwight D. Eisenhower to describe the informal alliance between a nation’s military and the defense industry that supplies it. It warns of a structural danger where the profit motives of weapons manufacturers drive national policy toward perpetual war.
Read more, and suburbia - The civil rights movement: Brown v Board, Montgomery, Little Rock, Greensboro, and the March on Washington
- Kennedy: Camelot, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and civil rights
- Johnson: the Great Society, the Civil Rights Act, and Vietnam escalation
- The 1968 crisis: King, Kennedy, Chicago, and the fracturing of the Democratic coalition
- Nixon: détenteDétente Full Description A policy of relaxation of tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, pursued primarily between 1969 and 1979. Under Nixon and Kissinger, détente produced the SALT I arms limitation treaty (1972), the Helsinki Accords (1975), and the opening of relations with China. It rested on the assumption that managing superpower rivalry through negotiation and trade was preferable to confrontation, and that binding the Soviet Union into international agreements would moderate its behaviour. Critical Perspective Détente was attacked from both left and right: the left criticised it for propping up authoritarian regimes; the right, including Ronald Reagan, condemned it for legitimising Soviet power and failing to demand human rights improvements. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 is often cited as détente’s death blow, though critics argue that both superpowers continued to pursue their strategic interests — détente was always more rhetorical than structural., the Southern strategy, and Watergate
- Ford, Carter, and the end of the post-war consensus
Key historiographical debates
- The civil rights movement: top-down leadership (King) or bottom-up grassroots activism?
- The Great Society: genuine achievement or liberal overreach?
- Vietnam: presidential escalation, military failure, or a war that could not be won?
- Watergate: Nixon’s personal corruption or systemic abuse of the imperial presidencyImperial Presidency
Full Description:A term coined by historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. to describe a presidency that has exceeded its constitutional limits. It refers to the gradual accumulation of unchecked power by the executive branch, particularly in foreign policy and war-making, culminating in the abuses of the Nixon era. The Imperial Presidency argues that the Cold War fundamentally unbalanced the American constitution. The constant state of crisis allowed Presidents to bypass Congress, wage undeclared wars, and cloak their actions in secrecy. Nixon was not an anomaly but the logical endpoint of this trend, believing the President’s powers were virtually unlimited.
Critical Perspective:Watergate was the crash of the Imperial Presidency. The post-Watergate reforms (War Powers Act, FISA courts) were attempts to dismantle this structure. However, critics argue these reforms failed in the long run, and that the modern presidency has regained, and even surpassed, the “imperial” powers that Nixon claimed, often using the same “national security” justifications.
Read more?
AO3 Interpretation Pack — coming soon
An AO3 Interpretation Pack for AQA 2Q is in development. When complete, it will cover the major historiographical debates examined in this option, with named historians, paired comparison tasks built to AQA mark scheme logic, and provenance prompts for every debate. The first debate will be free and open to all.
