OCR Y224 – Apartheid and Reconciliation: South African Politics, 1948-1999

Check that this is your course

This guide is for Cambridge OCR A Level History A, H505/Y224/01: Apartheid and Reconciliation: South African Politics, 1948-1999.

Y224 is a Unit Group 2 non-British period study. The paper lasts 1 hour, carries 30 marks and is worth 15% of the A level. Choose either Question 1 or Question 2 and answer both parts.

• Part (a) is worth 10 marks. Compare the significance or consequences of two named events or factors and reach a supported judgement.
• Part (b) is a 20-mark essay. Analyse the issue in the question and sustain a substantiated judgement.
• Both parts assess AO1. There are no source passages and no interpretations question in this paper.

Your four key topics are establishing apartheid; its development and growing resistance; the collapse of apartheid, 1978-1989; and a new South Africa, 1989-1999.

Pause permission: begin with the five phases below. Add detailed laws, organisations and arguments once the overall sequence is secure.

Begin with five phases

1. Before and after 1948: older segregation was extended into a systematic apartheid state.
2. 1950s and 1960s: mass protest met intensifying repression; opposition changed after Sharpeville and the banning of movements.
3. 1970s: Black Consciousness, labour action and the Soweto uprising helped renew internal resistance.
4. 1978-1989: limited reform, emergency rule, mass mobilisation, economic pressure and international opposition created a deep crisis.
5. 1989-1999: negotiation ended white minority rule, but violence and unequal social conditions shaped the new democracy.

The central argument

Apartheid did not begin with prejudice suddenly appearing in 1948. South Africa already had conquest, segregation, unequal landholding, racialised labour and restricted political rights. The National Party victory made a difference because the state classified people more systematically and used law, bureaucracy and coercion to control residence, movement, education, relationships, work and political membership.

Apartheid remained powerful because it joined institutions together. Racial classification enabled spatial separation; pass controls managed labour and movement; unequal education narrowed opportunity; political exclusion protected white minority rule; police and emergency powers suppressed resistance. Its effects were unequal and varied. The official categories Black, White, Coloured and Indian were imposed instruments of government, not natural or internally uniform communities.

Resistance also changed. The ANC and allies organised non-violent defiance in the 1950s. The PAC split from the ANC. After Sharpeville, repression and banning encouraged underground and armed strategies. In the 1970s Black Consciousness, students and workers renewed mobilisation. In the 1980s community, civic, union, church, women’s and youth organisations created mass opposition while exiled movements, armed struggle and international campaigns added pressure.

Apartheid ended through interaction, not one magic cause. Internal mobilisation damaged governability and legitimacy. Repression produced escalating costs. Economic weakness and international financial pressure narrowed choices. Regional and Cold War changes altered strategy. National Party division and leadership mattered. Secret contact and public negotiation made a constitutional settlement possible. Mandela and de Klerk were important, but neither acted alone.

The 1994 election transformed political authority. It did not immediately redistribute land, wealth, skills, housing or health. The new constitution, Government of National Unity, Reconstruction and Development Programme and Truth and Reconciliation Commission addressed different parts of transition. By 1999 South Africa was a constitutional democracy with major achievements and severe inherited inequalities.

Anchor chronology

• 1948: National Party wins the white electorate and begins systematic apartheid legislation.
• 1950: Population Registration Act and Group Areas Act.
• 1952: Defiance Campaign.
• 1953: Bantu Education Act and Separate Amenities Act.
• 1955: Freedom Charter adopted.
• 1960: Sharpeville massacre; ANC and PAC banned.
• 1961: Umkhonto we Sizwe begins sabotage.
• 1963-1964: Rivonia Trial and life sentences for Mandela and others.
• 1976: Soweto uprising.
• 1977: Steve Biko dies in police custody.
• 1983: United Democratic Front launched.
• 1985-1990: State of Emergency.
• 1989: FW de Klerk becomes state president.
• 1990: ANC and other organisations unbanned; Mandela released.
• 1991: principal apartheid laws repealed; CODESA negotiations begin.
• 1994: first democratic election; Mandela becomes president.
• 1995: TRC established; Rugby World Cup in South Africa.
• 1996: final constitution adopted.
• 1999: second democratic election; Thabo Mbeki succeeds Mandela.

Essential vocabulary

Apartheid: institutionalised racial classification, segregation and white minority rule. Segregation: enforced separation; it existed before 1948 and provided foundations later extended by apartheid. Pass laws: controls on African movement and residence. Bantustan: territory presented as an ethnic homeland through which the state tried to deny Black South Africans national political rights. Petty apartheid: everyday segregation of amenities and public space. ANC: African National Congress, a major liberation movement with changing strategies. PAC: Pan Africanist Congress, formed after a split from the ANC in 1959. Black Consciousness: movement stressing psychological liberation, Black dignity and independent organisation. UDF: United Democratic Front, a broad internal coalition launched in 1983. Sanctions: restrictions intended to pressure the apartheid state economically, politically, culturally or through sport. Transitional justice: ways a society addresses violence and abuse during political change. TRC: Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which heard testimony and could grant individual amnesty for full disclosure of politically motivated acts.

Key topic 1: establishing apartheid

In 1948 only a minority of South Africans could vote in the decisive election. The National Party appealed to Afrikaner nationalism, fears of urbanisation and racial integration, and white economic and political interests. The electoral system translated its support into a parliamentary victory even though it received fewer votes than the United Party.

The Population Registration Act classified every person by race and made later controls easier to enforce. Prohibitions on mixed marriage and sexual relationships policed intimacy. The Group Areas Act enabled compulsory residential and commercial separation. Pass and influx controls restricted African movement. The Separate Amenities Act formalised segregation in public facilities, while Bantu Education placed African schooling under state control and designed it for an unequal social order.

Opposition included the ANC Youth League’s influence, the Programme of Action, the Defiance Campaign, trade unionism, women’s resistance and local protest. The state used arrests, banning orders, prosecutions and policing. When judging resistance to 1954, distinguish growth in participation and legitimacy from immediate ability to repeal laws.

Knowledge check

1. Why was 1948 both a turning point and part of a longer history?
2. How did classification, place, movement and education reinforce one another?
3. Why can a campaign be politically important without immediately changing government policy?

Key topic 2: development and growing resistance

Under Hendrik Verwoerd, separate development used Bantustans to claim that African political rights belonged outside common South African citizenship. The Bantu Self-Government Act strengthened this direction. John Vorster combined economic growth and state security with continued racial rule. Consequences differed across employment, residence, family life, education and access to power.

The 1955 Freedom Charter set out a broad non-racial democratic programme. The PAC rejected important elements of the ANC’s approach. In 1960 police killed protesters at Sharpeville during an anti-pass campaign. Emergency measures, banning and trials narrowed legal opposition. The ANC and PAC developed armed wings, while the Rivonia Trial removed much of the internal ANC leadership.

Apparent stability in the 1960s did not mean consent. The Black Consciousness movement associated with Steve Biko emphasised dignity and independent Black organisation. Labour strikes and student activism expanded opposition. In 1976 school students in Soweto protested against language and education policy; police violence helped spread revolt and international condemnation.

Women were not an optional addition to resistance history. They organised against passes, removals, poor services and state control, while also confronting inequalities within political movements. International criticism developed through the United Nations, independent African states, churches, unions, consumer campaigns, cultural action and sport.

Knowledge check

1. What did separate development claim, and what did it achieve for white minority rule?
2. Why did resistance strategies change after 1960?
3. How did Black Consciousness and Soweto reshape opposition?

Key topic 3: collapse, 1978-1989

By 1978 apartheid retained armed force, bureaucracy, business resources and support among many white voters. It also faced demographic change, labour needs, international isolation, regional conflict and renewed resistance. PW Botha described a Total Onslaught and answered with a Total Strategy: security mobilisation combined with selective reform.

The 1983 constitution created separate parliamentary chambers for White, Coloured and Indian representatives but excluded the Black majority. The UDF united hundreds of organisations against it. Township protest, rent and consumer boycotts, student action, trade union growth, church leadership and underground ANC activity weakened local administration. Resistance was broad but not uniform, and political violence included conflict among opponents of apartheid.

Emergency rule from 1985 expanded detention, censorship and security power. Repression could disrupt movements but further damaged legitimacy. International pressure included financial withdrawal, trade and cultural campaigns and sport. Sanctions mattered, but their impact depended on domestic unrest, economic weakness, business calculations and political change.

Do not replace one simple story with another. The end of the Cold War, regional settlements, National Party division, economic constraint, mass resistance, ANC survival, international pressure and individual leadership all altered the choices available. De Klerk’s reforms were consequential because a crisis already existed and because organised opponents could negotiate.

Knowledge check

1. What strengths did the apartheid state retain after 1978?
2. Why did limited reform create new opposition?
3. How would you compare sanctions, mass resistance and leadership without listing them?

Key topic 4: a new South Africa, 1989-1999

In February 1990 de Klerk unbanned liberation organisations, and Mandela was released. Negotiation was neither smooth nor peaceful. CODESA talks, constitutional bargaining, state and communal violence, conflict involving the ANC and Inkatha, right-wing resistance and uncertainty over security forces all shaped the transition. The 1993 interim constitution enabled the April 1994 election.

The ANC won the election and Mandela led a Government of National Unity. The final constitution entrenched democratic institutions and rights. The RDP aimed to address housing, services and inequality, but administrative capacity, fiscal choices and the scale of inherited deprivation limited rapid transformation.

The TRC heard victims, investigated gross violations and offered conditional amnesty to applicants who made full disclosure of politically motivated acts. It created a major public record and enabled testimony. Critics questioned uneven participation, limited prosecution, reparations and the gap between personal violations and structural injustice. Reconciliation must therefore be evaluated against explicit criteria.

Sport could produce visible moments of shared identification, especially the 1995 Rugby World Cup, but symbolism did not by itself remove material inequality. HIV/AIDS became a grave social challenge. By 1999 democratic elections and constitutional government had endured, South Africa’s international position had changed, and political citizenship had been transformed. Poverty, unemployment, unequal land and wealth, violent crime and unequal public provision remained.

Knowledge check

1. Why must political violence be included in the negotiation story?
2. What changed fundamentally in 1994, and what did not?
3. What different criteria could be used to judge the TRC?

Part (a): compare two named factors

1. Define the exact outcome in the question: significance for what, consequences for whom, and over which dates?
2. Give each factor accurate, relevant knowledge.
3. Explain the mechanism connecting each factor to the outcome.
4. Compare reach, depth, duration and dependence on other factors.
5. Reach a direct judgement that refers to both factors.

Do not write two disconnected mini-essays. Comparative sentences should explain why a consequence was broader, deeper, more durable or more enabling than the alternative.

Part (b): build a sustained judgement

Turn the claim into criteria. For a question about the dismantling of apartheid, you might compare ability to undermine governability, legitimacy, economic viability and willingness to negotiate. Organise paragraphs around these tests rather than narrating decades in order. Use precise evidence across the relevant period and qualify your conclusion.

Common traps

• calling apartheid only segregation without explaining state power;
• beginning every cause in 1948 and ignoring continuity;
• treating imposed racial groups as uniform;
• making resistance an ANC-only story;
• turning Sharpeville or Soweto into an isolated event;
• claiming sanctions alone ended apartheid;
• presenting Mandela and de Klerk as acting above institutions;
• describing negotiation as peaceful or inevitable;
• equating the 1994 election with complete social equality;
• treating the TRC as either perfect healing or simple impunity;
• using interpretations or source provenance in an AO1 paper;
• describing both factors in part (a) without comparing them.

Final retrieval check

Can you explain continuity and change in 1948; connect the main laws; compare resistance movements and methods; explain Sharpeville, Soweto and the 1980s crisis; judge interacting causes of collapse; describe negotiation and violence; distinguish democratisation from transformation; evaluate the TRC; and answer both question types with explicit criteria?

If not, return to the relevant section. You do not need to relearn the entire course.