If this is your course, you are studying how Wessex survived Viking conquest under Alfred and how his successors expanded, contested and rebuilt royal authority until Cnut became king of England in 1016.

The course has two connected but differently assessed parts. The enquiry studies Alfred through four contemporary sources. The period study follows the making of England from Edward the Elder to Aethelred and the conquest of 1016.

First, check that this is your course

• Cambridge OCR A Level History A, H505;
• Unit Group 1: British period study and enquiry;
• Unit Y101/01;
• Enquiry topic: Alfred the Great, 871-899;
• Period study: The Making of England, 899-1016.

This is not OCR Y102, which begins after Cnut’s death in 1035 and continues through the Norman Conquest. Y101 ends when Cnut takes sole control of England in 1016.

Your course in one view

Enquiry: Alfred the Great, 871-899

1. Alfred and the Vikings.
2. Alfred and governance.
3. Literacy, learning and Alfredian culture.

Period study: The Making of England, 899-1016

1. Edward the Elder, 899-924.
2. Athelstan, 924-939.
3. Edmund, Eadred and Edgar, 939-975.
4. Aethelred and the crisis of 978-1016.

The central story is not that Alfred single-handedly founded England. West Saxon survival depended on soldiers, resources, settlements and alliances. Later kings, Aethelflaed of Mercia, churchmen, local elites and Scandinavian communities all shaped the kingdom. England was made, challenged and remade over generations.

The starting world: southern Britain in 871

Viking armies had conquered or dominated Northumbria, East Anglia and much of Mercia. Wessex remained the strongest independent Anglo-Saxon kingdom. Alfred became king after his brother Aethelred died during a year of intense warfare.

Viking was an activity and identity connected with raiding, migration, trade and warfare, not the name of one united people or army. Different Scandinavian leaders pursued different aims. Some forces sought tribute or plunder; others settled and ruled territory.

Kings governed through households, assemblies, land grants, law, local lords and the Church. They needed warriors and resources, but also reputation, counsel and Christian legitimacy. Alfred inherited these institutions; he did not create government from nothing.

Starting-world check

1. Why was Wessex important in 871?
2. Why should Viking forces not be treated as one permanent army?
3. Which resources did kings need besides soldiers?
4. Why is survival a better starting question than inevitable victory?

Essential vocabulary

• Viking: someone involved in Scandinavian raiding or overseas warfare; the term does not describe every Scandinavian settler.
• Danelaw: a later term for areas where Danish law and settlement were influential; it was not one timeless, sharply bounded state.
• Burh: a fortified settlement contributing to defence, administration and economic activity.
• Fyrd: military service raised from free landholders and communities.
• Hide: a unit used to assess land and obligations, including taxation and military service.
• Ealdorman: a senior regional royal officer and military leader.
• Witan: a modern name for assemblies of leading churchmen and nobles who advised the king.
• Tribute: payment intended to purchase peace, redirect an enemy or secure a political agreement.
• Submission: an acknowledgement of another ruler’s superiority; its meaning and duration depended on circumstances.
• Charter: a written royal grant or record, often concerning land or privilege.
• Law code: a written collection of royal laws and legal principles.
• Monastic reform: a movement to renew disciplined religious life and reorganise monasteries, often involving royal patronage and property disputes.
• Coinage reform: changes designed to standardise coins, mints and royal control over currency.
• Ill-counselled: the meaning behind Aethelred’s later nickname Unready; it does not mean unprepared.

---

1. Alfred and the Vikings

Alfred’s first years included defeats and negotiated payments. Wessex survived, but survival was costly. In 878 Guthrum’s forces attacked unexpectedly and Alfred withdrew to Athelney. He rebuilt support before defeating Guthrum at Edington.

Guthrum was baptised and an agreement defined political relationships and territory. Conversion, hostages and peace transformed a military victory into a settlement. It did not end all Viking activity or create one permanent border.

Alfred strengthened Wessex’s ability to respond. Fortified burhs protected strategic centres and supported markets and administration. Military obligations were organised so forces could serve while communities and agriculture continued. Ships formed one part of defence, but Alfred did not invent an English navy from nothing.

Renewed attacks in the 890s tested these arrangements. Alfred used fortifications, field armies, alliances, pursuit and negotiation. Viking leaders were also divided and faced supply problems. Success resulted from a system and many participants, not one king’s battlefield talent alone.

Knowledge check

1. Why were Alfred’s early payments not simply surrender?
2. Why was Edington significant?
3. How did burhs support more than defence?
4. Why did military organisation matter?
5. Which factors besides Alfred’s leadership explain success in the 890s?

2. Alfred and governance

Alfred ruled Wessex and developed influence beyond it. His relationship with Mercia was crucial. Aethelred, Lord of the Mercians, and Alfred’s daughter Aethelflaed governed Mercia in alliance with Wessex. Welsh rulers also sought Alfred’s protection or recognised his superiority for their own political reasons.

Royal government worked through land, service, officials, assemblies and written orders. The burghal system linked defence to assessed obligations. Coinage and royal centres strengthened authority. Alfred relied on advisers and local elites because no early medieval king governed alone.

Alfred’s law code combined biblical material, laws associated with earlier English kings and new provisions. It presented the king as a Christian lawgiver acting with counsel. Written law did not mean every dispute was decided uniformly, but it expressed standards and royal responsibility for justice.

By Alfred’s later reign, titles and texts increasingly presented him as king of the Anglo-Saxons. This expressed leadership of West Saxons and people connected with English Mercia. It was an important claim, not proof that he directly governed all England.

Knowledge check

1. Why was Mercian cooperation essential?
2. How were defence and administration connected?
3. What did the law code communicate about kingship?
4. Why did Alfred need advisers and local elites?
5. What did king of the Anglo-Saxons claim and not claim?

3. Literacy, learning and Alfredian culture

Alfred described a decline in Latin learning that prevented some clergy from understanding important texts. He recruited scholars from elsewhere in Britain and continental Europe and promoted education and selected translations into English.

Works associated with his programme included Gregory the Great’s *Pastoral Care*. Alfred’s preface connected learning to an earlier age of wisdom and to the responsibilities of rulers and bishops. Vernacular writing widened access for those unable to read Latin, although literacy remained concentrated among clergy and elites.

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle helped organise the past around West Saxon and English political experience. Asser’s *Life of Alfred* praised the king’s character, learning and rule. Their closeness to Alfred’s court gives precise evidence about royal priorities, but also means they helped construct his reputation.

Alfred did not personally write every work once attributed to him, and later legends must be separated from contemporary evidence. Cultural renewal mattered because it trained servants of Church and government, promoted Christian conduct and explained why Alfred’s rule deserved obedience.

Enquiry check

1. What problem did Alfred’s learning programme address?
2. Why promote writing in English?
3. How could learning strengthen government?
4. What makes Asser valuable but not neutral?
5. Why must later Alfred legends be controlled?

You can pause here. If you can connect warfare, settlement, administration, law and learning, you have built the complete source-enquiry foundation.

---

4. Edward the Elder, 899-924

Alfred’s death did not guarantee a peaceful succession. Edward faced a challenge from his cousin Aethelwold, who allied with Scandinavian forces. Aethelwold’s death in battle in 902 reduced the threat and secured Edward’s position.

Edward and Aethelflaed built fortified centres and campaigned against Scandinavian rulers in the Midlands and East Anglia. Aethelflaed governed Mercia with substantial agency; she was not merely carrying out Edward’s orders. After her death in 918, Edward absorbed Mercia more directly and displaced her daughter Aelfwynn.

Campaigning brought areas of the Danelaw under West Saxon and Mercian authority. Submission could involve local leaders accepting a stronger king while retaining influence. Scandinavian settlement and custom did not disappear when political control changed.

Sources claim Welsh kings, the Scottish king and the ruler of Northumbria submitted to Edward. These statements show prestige and negotiation, but not permanent administration of all Britain. At Edward’s death, authority over Northumbria remained uncertain.

Knowledge check

1. Why was Edward’s succession insecure?
2. What did Aethelflaed contribute?
3. How did fortified expansion work?
4. Why did conquest not erase Scandinavian society?
5. How should claims of wider submission be interpreted?

---

5. Athelstan, 924-939

Athelstan first secured Wessex and Mercia, then captured York in 927 after the death of its Scandinavian king. This made him the first West Saxon ruler to govern the main territories understood as England at the same time.

He used titles presenting himself as king of the English and sometimes ruler of all Britain. Meetings with Welsh and Scottish rulers, boundary agreements and tribute expressed superiority, but relationships remained negotiated and could be resisted.

In 937 a coalition involving Constantine of Scotland, Owain of Strathclyde and Olaf Guthfrithson challenged Athelstan. His victory at Brunanburh protected his kingdom and became celebrated in verse. The coalition itself shows that his expansion generated powerful opposition.

Athelstan’s court attracted rulers, churchmen and envoys from Britain and Europe. Royal marriages linked his family to continental dynasties. Large assemblies, charters and law codes addressed theft, order, coinage and local responsibility. Government and diplomacy supported conquest rather than simply following it.

Knowledge check

1. Why was York important in 927?
2. What did Athelstan’s titles seek to express?
3. Why did Brunanburh matter?
4. What does the opposing coalition reveal?
5. How did court, law and diplomacy strengthen kingship?

6. Edmund, Eadred and Edgar, 939-975

Athelstan’s death reopened northern conflict. Olaf Guthfrithson recovered York and territory in the Midlands. Edmund later regained the five boroughs and campaigned in Strathclyde. Eadred faced rival Scandinavian kings at York, including Eric Bloodaxe, before Northumbria was more securely incorporated in the 950s.

These reversals show that England was not completed once in 927. Kings needed local allies, military force and political settlements to maintain northern rule.

Edgar became sole king in 959 after an earlier division with his brother Eadwig. His reign was relatively peaceful. Royal government developed through charters, law, local officials and a more standardised coinage. The coronation at Bath in 973 presented sacred and commanding kingship; later meetings with other rulers projected wider status.

Edgar supported monastic reform associated with Dunstan, Aethelwold and Oswald. Reformers sought disciplined communal life and sometimes replaced secular clerks with monks. Royal patronage aided reform, but property changes and local opposition made it contested.

Knowledge check

1. Why was northern control reversible after 939?
2. How did Edmund and Eadred recover authority?
3. Why was Edgar able to emphasise consolidation?
4. What did the 973 coronation communicate?
5. Why was monastic reform contested?

7. Aethelred and the crisis of 978-1016

Edward the Martyr was killed in 978, and his young half-brother Aethelred succeeded in a climate of suspicion. Some churchmen later interpreted disasters as punishment, shaping his reputation.

Large-scale Scandinavian attacks returned. The defeat at Maldon in 991 was followed by tribute. Payments could buy time, redirect forces or support diplomacy, but imposed heavy costs and did not ensure lasting peace. England’s taxation and coinage made such payments possible and also advertised its wealth.

Aethelred issued substantial law codes and worked with Archbishop Wulfstan. Government remained active, but commanders and magnates disagreed. Relations with Normandy, the marriage to Emma, the role of Eadric Streona and shifting Scandinavian leaders complicated strategy.

Thorkell’s army entered Aethelred’s service after receiving tribute. Sweyn Forkbeard conquered England in 1013, forcing Aethelred into exile, but Sweyn’s death allowed his return. In 1016 Aethelred died amid renewed war between Cnut and Edmund Ironside.

Edmund fought several campaigns before agreeing to divide the kingdom with Cnut. Edmund’s death left Cnut sole king. The conquest resulted from sustained military pressure, political division, wealth, diplomacy and adaptable leadership. Aethelred’s nickname cannot explain it.

Knowledge check

1. How did Edward’s murder affect Aethelred’s accession?
2. Why could tribute be rational but risky?
3. What shows that government still functioned?
4. Why did loyalties shift?
5. Which combined factors explain Cnut’s victory?

---

The whole story in ten anchor dates

• 871: Alfred becomes king during intense Viking warfare.
• 878: Alfred survives the crisis, wins at Edington and settles with Guthrum.
• 899: Alfred dies and Edward faces a contested succession.
• 918: Aethelflaed dies; Mercia is absorbed more directly by Edward.
• 927: Athelstan captures York and establishes wider English kingship.
• 937: Athelstan defeats a major coalition at Brunanburh.
• 954: the fall of Eric Bloodaxe helps secure Northumbria.
• 973: Edgar’s coronation expresses consolidated Christian kingship.
• 991: Maldon and tribute mark renewed Scandinavian pressure.
• 1016: Edmund and Cnut divide England; Edmund’s death leaves Cnut king.

---

What your OCR examination asks you to do

Y101 is a written paper lasting 1 hour 30 minutes and worth 50 marks, or 25 percent of the A Level.

• Section A: Alfred the Great, 871-899. Answer one compulsory 30-mark source question. Assess how far four contemporary sources, used in their historical context, support a stated view.
• Section B: The Making of England, 899-1016. Answer one 20-mark essay from a choice of two.

For Section A, identify what each source claims. Test it using exact context, then use authorship, date, purpose, genre and relationship to Alfred’s court to explain evidential value. Court connection does not make a source useless. Compare all four and judge how far the set supports the stated view.

For Section B, answer the exact wording and period. Organise the response around factors, developments or criteria rather than narrating every reign. Compare importance, trace change and continuity and reach a supported judgement.

Practice

Period-study essay plan

How far was military success the main reason English royal authority expanded from 899 to 975?

Consider campaigning, burhs, Mercian cooperation, local submission, dynastic succession, law, assemblies, Church support, coinage and royal ritual. Decide what victory made possible and what sustained control afterward.

Source-enquiry routine

For a source about Alfred’s success against Viking forces:

1. Identify whether it stresses battle, defence, leadership, diplomacy, religion or resources.
2. Place it precisely in the 871-899 sequence.
3. Test its claim with contextual knowledge.
4. Explain how its origin shapes emphasis and value.
5. Compare the four sources and judge how far they support the stated view.

Your next action

Retell the course using the ten anchor dates. Then explain one connection in each pair: Edington and settlement; burhs and government; learning and Christian kingship; Aethelflaed and Danelaw expansion; York and Brunanburh; northern instability and Edgar’s consolidation; English taxation and Viking conquest.

If the names and changing control of York become confusing, return to the seven-part map. Keep one ruler line and one northern-control line beside it. The goal is not to memorise every campaign: it is to explain how warfare, settlement, government and political identity repeatedly remade England.