Africa’s twentieth century was shaped by colonial conquest, resistance, and the long struggle for independence. From the League of NationsLeague of Nations
Full Description:The first worldwide intergovernmental organisation whose principal mission was to maintain world peace. Its spectacular failure to prevent the aggression of the Axis powers provided the negative blueprint for the United Nations, influencing the decision to prioritize enforcement power over pure idealism. The League of Nations was the precursor to the UN, established after the First World War. Founded on the principle of collective security, it relied on moral persuasion and unanimous voting. It ultimately collapsed because it lacked an armed force and, crucially, the United States never joined, rendering it toothless in the face of expansionist empires.
Critical Perspective:The shadow of the League looms over the UN. The founders of the UN viewed the League as “too democratic” and ineffective because it treated all nations as relatively equal. Consequently, the UN was designed specifically to correct this “error” by empowering the Great Powers (via the Security Council) to police the world, effectively sacrificing sovereign equality for the sake of stability.
Read more Mandate SystemMandate System
Full Description:A mechanism established by the League of Nations after World War I to administer former Ottoman and German territories. “Class A” Mandates—Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, and Transjordan—were considered nearly ready for independence but placed under temporary control of France or Britain until they could “stand alone.” In reality, Mandates were colonies by another name.
Critical Perspective:The Mandate System was hypocrisy institutionalized. The same powers that carved up the Middle East for their own advantage claimed they were acting as benevolent trustees. No timetable for independence was set; “readiness” was defined by the mandatory power. Iraq was granted nominal independence in 1932, but with a British client king and treaty that preserved British military bases and oil control. The Mandate was not the road to freedom but the road to neocolonialism.
Read more that carved up former German and Ottoman territories, through the Bandung Conference and the liberation movements of the 1950s and 60s, to the fall of white minority rule in Rhodesia and the end of South African ApartheidApartheid
Full Description:
An Afrikaans word meaning “apartness.” It refers to the system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination that governed South Africa. It was a totalizing legal framework that dictated where people could live, work, and travel based on their racial classification. Apartheid was not merely social prejudice; it was a sophisticated economic and legal machine designed to maintain white minority rule. It involved the complete spatial separation of the races, the banning of mixed marriages, and the denial of voting rights to the black majority.
Critical Perspective:Critically, Apartheid was a system of racial capitalism. Its primary function was to secure a steady supply of cheap, compliant labor for the white-owned mines and farms. By keeping the black population uneducated, disenfranchised, and restricted to specific areas, the state ensured that the immense wealth generated by the country’s resources flowed exclusively to the white minority and international investors.
— these ten episodes of Explaining History trace the key currents of modern African history.
Browse all topic collections at our Best History Podcasts hub.
Colonial Africa and Resistance (1919–1945)
After the First World War, the victorious powers used the Mandate System to extend their control over former German colonies in Africa. But resistance to imperial rule was already building — in petitions, protests, and Pan-African intellectual movements that would eventually transform the continent.
Petitions, Protests and the Mandate System 1919–21
It is easy to read history through the eyes of the coloniser rather than the colonised. This episode looks at the petitions and protests from African and Middle Eastern peoples resisting the Mandate System — and asks what it reveals that the victorious powers were deaf to these voices from the start.
Britain, France and the Mandate System
During the First World War, much of the fighting occurred in colonial Africa. In 1918 the victorious powers determined that the continent could not govern itself. This episode explores how Britain and the USA colluded on a neo-colonial mandate system that preserved imperial control under a liberal veneer — and how African peoples experienced it.
Colonial Wealth Transfers: A New Analysis
What would have happened to Europe over the past two and a half centuries if it had not plundered the Global SouthGlobal South
Full Description:The Global South is a term that has largely replaced “Third World” to describe the nations of Africa, Latin America, and developing Asia. It is less a geographical designator (as it includes countries in the northern hemisphere) and more a political grouping of nations that share a history of colonialism, economic marginalization, and a peripheral position in the world financial system. Bandung is often cited as the birth of the Global South as a self-aware political consciousness.
Critical Perspective:While the term implies solidarity, critics argue it acts as a “flattening” concept. It lumps together economic superpowers like China and India with some of the world’s poorest nations, obscuring the vast power imbalances and divergent interests within this bloc. It risks creating a binary worldview that ignores the internal class exploitations within developing nations by focusing solely on their external exploitation by the North.
Read more? This episode examines the staggering scale of colonial wealth extraction from Africa, Asia and Latin America — and what the new scholarship on wealth transfers tells us about the foundations of European prosperity.
Decolonisation and the Cold War (1945–1970)
After 1945, the tide of history turned against European empire. African independence movements gained momentum across the continent, while the Cold War gave the superpowers an interest in Africa’s politics that complicated and often undermined genuine liberation. Britain’s attempt to hold its African colonies through white settler federation ended in failure.
The Bandung Conference
In 1955, the leaders of recently decolonised nations of Africa and Asia met in Bandung, Indonesia to forge new economic and diplomatic ties outside the Cold War blocs. The conference was the founding moment of the Non-Aligned Movement and one of the most important international gatherings of the twentieth century.
The Creation of the Central African Federation
In 1953, Britain created the Central African Federation — binding together Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia, and Nyasaland. Sold as an experiment in multiracial partnership, in reality it served white settler interests while tightening imperial control. This episode explores the political calculus behind the Federation and why African nationalists opposed it from the start.
Britain and the Central African Federation 1951–59
During the 1950s, Britain’s attempt to hold its African colonies brought it into conflict with white settlers who wanted domination over the Black population on an explicitly racist model. This episode explores how British policy navigated between settler ambitions, African nationalist demands, and Cold War pressures — and why it ultimately failed.
NeoliberalismSupply Side Economics Full Description:Supply-Side Economics posits that production (supply) is the key to economic prosperity. Proponents argue that by reducing the “burden” of taxes on the wealthy and removing regulatory barriers for corporations, investment will increase, creating jobs and expanding the economy. Key Policies: Tax Cuts: Specifically for high-income earners and corporations, under the premise that this releases capital for investment. Deregulation: Removing environmental, labor, and safety protections to lower the cost of doing business. Critical Perspective:Historical analysis suggests that supply-side policies rarely lead to the promised broad-based prosperity. Instead, they often result in massive budget deficits (starving the state of revenue) and a dramatic concentration of wealth at the top. Critics argue the “trickle-down” effect is a myth used to justify the upward redistribution of wealth. vs National Liberation Movements 1945–79
The decades after 1945 saw African and Asian liberation movements win political independence — only to find economic independence far harder to achieve. This episode examines the intersection of neoliberal economic ideology and national liberation: how the IMF, World Bank, and Western financial institutions constrained the newly independent states of Africa.
White Minority Rule and Liberation (1960s–1994)
The last phase of Africa’s decolonisation was the dismantling of white minority rule — from Ian Smith’s Rhodesia through South African Apartheid. These episodes trace the fall of Rhodesia, the anti-Apartheid struggle, and the long afterlives of colonial economic structures.
Eye Witness: The End of White Rule in Rhodesia
Journalist James McManus was in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe during the tumultuous 1970s as Ian Smith’s white minority government fell. He engaged with the key figures of the liberation struggle — Mugabe, Nkomo, Sithole — and this episode draws on his eyewitness account to explore one of the final acts of Africa’s colonial era.
South Africa’s Democracy: 30 Years On
Peter Hain and his family were forced to flee South Africa in the 1960s at the height of Apartheid. A veteran anti-Apartheid activist, Hain looks back on thirty years of democratic South Africa — what the ANC achieved, where the Mandela settlement fell short, and what the country’s ongoing inequalities reveal about the limits of political liberation without economic transformation.
Live Aid, Famine, Debt and Activism: A Four Decade Struggle for Justice
Live Aid in 1985 was the moment the West became aware of African famine on a mass scale — but the story journalist Paul Vallely tells in his book is more complex and more political than the concert suggested. This episode explores forty years of Western engagement with African poverty, from Band Aid through debt cancellation campaigns to the persistent failures of aid and structural adjustmentWashington Consensus The Washington Consensus refers to a specific array of policy recommendations that became the standard reform package offered to crisis-wracked developing countries. While ostensibly designed to stabilize volatile economies, critics argue it functions as a tool of neocolonialism, enforcing Western economic dominance on the Global South. Key Components: Fiscal Discipline: Strict limits on government borrowing, often resulting in deep cuts to social programs. Trade Liberalization: Opening local markets to foreign competition, often before domestic industries are strong enough to compete. Privatization: Selling off state-owned enterprises to private investors. Critical Perspective:By making aid and loans conditional on these reforms, the consensus effectively strips sovereign nations of their ability to determine their own economic destiny. It prioritizes the repayment of international debts over the welfare of local populations, often leading to increased poverty and the erosion of public infrastructure..
Subscribe to Explaining History
New episodes every week. Subscribe free on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.
