selma-montgomery-marches
The three protest marches of 1965 along the 54-mile road from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama, demanding voting rights for Black Americans. The televised police violence against peaceful marchers on ‘Bloody Sunday’, 7 March 1965, directly produced the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The Selma campaign began as a voter registration drive in Dallas County, Alabama, where just 335 of 15,000 eligible Black voters were registered, facing a county registrar who administered discriminatory literacy tests. The first march, on 7 March 1965, involved approximately 600 marchers who were attacked by state troopers and Dallas County sheriff’s deputies at the Edmund Pettus Bridge with clubs, horses, and tear gas. The attacks were captured on film by television cameras and broadcast that evening on national news programmes, interrupting the first television broadcast of Judgment at Nuremberg — the juxtaposition of Nazi brutality with American state violence was noted at the time. The images of Amelia Boynton Robinson lying unconscious and John Lewis with a fractured skull circulated worldwide. Within days, President Johnson was before Congress requesting what became the Voting Rights Act. A second march attempt was turned back by court order; the third, with federal protection authorised by Johnson and a federal court, proceeded over five days and reached Montgomery on 25 March, with King delivering his ‘How Long, Not Long’ speech at the state capitol. The Voting Rights Act was signed on 6 August 1965.
Selma represents the civil rights movement’s most direct demonstration of the power of nonviolent direct action: peaceful marchers, attacked on a bridge in front of cameras, produced federal legislation within five months. The efficiency of the causal chain — television images, public outrage, political pressure, legislative response — obscures how contingent the outcome was. The Dallas County sheriff Jim Clark’s violence at the bridge was not inevitable; a more restrained response might have produced no images and no political crisis. The civil rights movement’s strategy required state violence to work, which meant it required the other side to be reliably brutal. Where state violence was disciplined enough to avoid visible atrocity, the strategy worked less well — which is partly why the movement’s attempt to transplant its methods to Chicago in 1966 produced less dramatic results. The Voting Rights Act’s subsequent history — partial gutting by the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) — demonstrates that the legislative victories of 1965 were durable achievements but not permanent ones.
Leave a Reply