muslim-brotherhood-syria
The Syrian branch of the transnational Islamist movement, founded in 1945, which mounted an armed insurgency against the Assad regime in the late 1970s and early 1980s before being crushed at Hama. It remained the most significant Syrian opposition organisation in exile for three decades.
The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood had a more complex and in some respects more politically sophisticated history than its armed conflict with Assad might suggest. Founded by Mustafa al-Siba’i in 1945, it participated in Syrian parliamentary politics through the 1940s and 1950s, built a significant social infrastructure including schools, hospitals, and charitable organisations, and developed a political ideology that combined Islamic social ethics with nationalist politics in ways distinct from the Egyptian Brotherhood’s more purist orientation. The relationship with the Ba’ath regime deteriorated rapidly after 1963; Brotherhood members in the security services were purged, the party’s social organisations were closed, and a low-level cycle of repression and resistance began. The late 1970s saw escalation: the Fighting Vanguard — a Brotherhood offshoot or parallel organisation — conducted assassinations of Ba’ath officials and Alawites in positions of authority. The regime’s response, culminating in Hama 1982, destroyed the Brotherhood inside Syria and forced its leadership and membership into exile, primarily in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and the United Kingdom. In exile, the Brotherhood remained the most organised Syrian opposition grouping, publishing, fundraising, and maintaining a political infrastructure that allowed it to re-emerge as an actor in the post-2011 uprising — though with more limited influence than its decades of organisational continuity might have suggested.
The Syrian Brotherhood’s history illustrates the difficulty of sustaining an opposition movement across generations of exile. The organisation that entered exile in 1982 was a community of militants who had lived through the Hama massacre and the Ba’ath’s systematic destruction of their social networks; the organisation that returned to political relevance in 2011 was led by men who had grown up in European cities and had to rebuild connections with a Syrian society they had not inhabited for decades. The gap between exile politics and domestic politics — between the concerns of diaspora communities and the immediate material needs of people living under the regime — is a structural feature of all exiled opposition movements, and the Syrian Brotherhood navigated it with varying success. Its record in post-Assad Syria — uncertain in its influence, resented by other opposition factions as a foreign import despite its Syrian origins — reflects both this gap and the deep suspicion that decades of regime propaganda about the Brotherhood had embedded in Syrian political culture.
Leave a Reply