Explaining History Podcast

 Chicago School of Economics

Explaining History Podcast

 Chicago School of Economics

Reading time:

6–10 minutes

Full Description:
A neoclassical school of thought associated with the University of Chicago, dominated by figures like Milton Friedman. It provided the academic and “scientific” justification for deregulationDeregulation Full Description:The systematic removal or simplification of government rules and regulations that constrain business activity. Framed as “cutting red tape” to unleash innovation, it involves stripping away protections for workers, consumers, and the environment. Deregulation is a primary tool of neoliberal policy. It targets everything from financial oversight (allowing banks to take bigger risks) to safety standards and environmental laws. The argument is that regulations increase costs and stifle competition. Critical Perspective:History has shown that deregulation often leads to corporate excess, monopoly power, and systemic instability. The removal of financial guardrails directly contributed to major economic collapses. Furthermore, it represents a transfer of power from the democratic state (which creates regulations) to private corporations (who are freed from accountability).
Read more, privatizationPrivatization Full Description:The transfer of ownership, property, or business from the government to the private sector. It involves selling off public assets—such as water, rail, energy, and housing—turning shared public goods into commodities for profit. Privatization is based on the neoliberal assumption that the private sector is inherently more efficient than the public sector. Governments sell off state-owned enterprises to private investors, often at discounted rates, arguing that the profit motive will drive better service and lower costs. Critical Perspective:Critics view privatization as the “enclosure of the commons.” It frequently leads to higher prices for essential services, as private companies prioritize shareholder returns over public access. It also hollows out the state, stripping it of its capacity to act and leaving citizens at the mercy of private monopolies for their basic needs (like water or electricity).
Read more, and the primacy of markets over government intervention. The Chicago School was the academic engine room of the neoliberal turn. It rejected the post-war consensus that governments should manage the economy to ensure full employment. Instead, it argued that the money supply was the only variable that mattered (monetarismMonetarism Monetarism is the economic school of thought associated with Milton Friedman, which rose to dominance as a counter to Keynesian economics. It posits that inflation is always a monetary phenomenon and that the government’s role should be limited to managing the currency rather than stimulating demand. Key Mechanisms: Inflation Targeting: Using interest rates to keep inflation low, even if high interest rates cause recession or unemployment. Fiscal Restraint: Opposing government deficit spending to boost the economy during downturns. Critical Perspective:Critics argue that monetarism breaks the post-war social contract. By prioritizing “sound money” and low inflation above all else, monetarist policies often induce deliberately high unemployment to discipline the labor force and suppress wages. It represents a technical solution to political problems, removing economic policy from democratic accountability. ) and that market efficiency was mathematically superior to state regulation.

Critical Perspective:
This school effectively depoliticized economic inequality. By framing economics as a “hard science” governed by immutable natural laws, they argued that poverty and unemployment were not political failures, but “natural” outcomes of the market. This intellectual prestige was used to justify brutal economic shock therapies in places like Chile and later the UK and US.

What is NeoliberalismSupply Side Economics Full Description:Supply-Side Economics posits that production (supply) is the key to economic prosperity. Proponents argue that by reducing the “burden” of taxes on the wealthy and removing regulatory barriers for corporations, investment will increase, creating jobs and expanding the economy. Key Policies: Tax Cuts: Specifically for high-income earners and corporations, under the premise that this releases capital for investment. Deregulation: Removing environmental, labor, and safety protections to lower the cost of doing business. Critical Perspective:Historical analysis suggests that supply-side policies rarely lead to the promised broad-based prosperity. Instead, they often result in massive budget deficits (starving the state of revenue) and a dramatic concentration of wealth at the top. Critics argue the “trickle-down” effect is a myth used to justify the upward redistribution of wealth.? An Introduction

At its core, neoliberalism is an economic and political philosophy that emphasizes free-market capitalism. It advocates for policies such as privatization of public services, deregulation of industries, and the reduction of government intervention in the economy. The central belief is that economic growth and individual prosperity are best achieved by liberating private enterprise and encouraging competition. However, the term itself is often used pejoratively, and its real-world applications have sparked considerable debate about its impact on inequality and social welfare.

 

Key Terms and Concepts in Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism (definition):

An economic and political ideology promoting free-market capitalism, reduced government intervention, and privatization of state assets. It emerged in the late 20th century as a reaction against Keynesian economicsKeynesian Economics Full Description:The dominant economic consensus of the post-war era which argued that the government had a duty to intervene in the economy to maintain full employment and manage demand. Neoliberalism defined itself primarily as a reaction against and a dismantling of this system. Keynesian Economics underpinned the “Golden Age” of capitalism and the welfare state. It operated on the belief that unregulated markets were prone to collapse and that the state must act as a counterbalance—spending money during recessions and taxing during booms—to ensure social stability and public welfare. Critical Perspective:From the neoliberal viewpoint, Keynesianism was a slippery slope to totalitarianism. However, critics argue the dismantling of this consensus broke the social contract between capital and labor. By abandoning the commitment to full employment and social safety nets, the state abdicated its responsibility to its citizens, prioritizing the health of the currency over the health of the population.
Read more and state planning.

Free Market Economy:

A system where prices and production are determined by private competition rather than state control. Neoliberal thinkers argue that free markets encourage innovation, efficiency, and consumer choice.

Privatization of PublicServices:

The transfer of ownership or management of public sectors such as transport, healthcare, or energy into private hands. Advocates claim it increases efficiency; critics see it as weakening social equity and accountability.

Deregulation (economic policy):

The reduction or elimination of government rules overseeing business activity. A central neoliberal reform, deregulation is credited with stimulating growth but blamed for financial crises and corporate excess.

The Washington ConsensusWashington Consensus The Washington Consensus refers to a specific array of policy recommendations that became the standard reform package offered to crisis-wracked developing countries. While ostensibly designed to stabilize volatile economies, critics argue it functions as a tool of neocolonialism, enforcing Western economic dominance on the Global South. Key Components: Fiscal Discipline: Strict limits on government borrowing, often resulting in deep cuts to social programs. Trade Liberalization: Opening local markets to foreign competition, often before domestic industries are strong enough to compete. Privatization: Selling off state-owned enterprises to private investors. Critical Perspective:By making aid and loans conditional on these reforms, the consensus effectively strips sovereign nations of their ability to determine their own economic destiny. It prioritizes the repayment of international debts over the welfare of local populations, often leading to increased poverty and the erosion of public infrastructure.:

A set of free-market economic policies promoted in the 1980s and 1990s by institutions like the IMF and World Bank, emphasizing fiscal discipline, trade liberalization, and privatization — often imposed on developing countries.

Structural Adjustment ProgramsStructural Adjustment Programs Full Description:Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) are the enforcement mechanism of neoliberalism in the developing world. When countries face debt crises, international lenders provide bailouts only if the government agrees to restructure its economy according to free-market principles. Consequences: Erosion of Sovereignty: National governments lose control over their own budgets and priorities. Social Impact: Requirements to cut deficits frequently lead to the introduction of user fees for health and education, excluding the poor from essential services. Export Orientation: Economies are forced to focus on extracting resources for export to pay off debts, rather than growing food or goods for domestic consumption. Critical Perspective:Critics describe SAPs as a form of “debt peonage,” where developing nations remain perpetually indebted to Western financial institutions. The programs often result in a net flow of wealth from the poor global South to the rich global North, exacerbating underdevelopment. (IMF and World Bank):

Economic reform packages requiring countries to cut public spending, open markets, and privatize industries in exchange for international loans. These became key tools for spreading neoliberal policies in the Global SouthGlobal South Full Description:The Global South is a term that has largely replaced “Third World” to describe the nations of Africa, Latin America, and developing Asia. It is less a geographical designator (as it includes countries in the northern hemisphere) and more a political grouping of nations that share a history of colonialism, economic marginalization, and a peripheral position in the world financial system. Bandung is often cited as the birth of the Global South as a self-aware political consciousness. Critical Perspective:While the term implies solidarity, critics argue it acts as a “flattening” concept. It lumps together economic superpowers like China and India with some of the world’s poorest nations, obscuring the vast power imbalances and divergent interests within this bloc. It risks creating a binary worldview that ignores the internal class exploitations within developing nations by focusing solely on their external exploitation by the North.
Read more.

Globalization and Neoliberalism:

The expansion of global trade, investment, and finance under neoliberal frameworks. Supporters argue it lifted millions from poverty; opponents highlight rising inequality and environmental degradation.

Financialization of the Economy:

The growing dominance of financial institutions, speculation, and shareholder value over production and labor. It marks a defining feature of the neoliberal era, shaping housing, employment, and inequality.

Market FundamentalismMarket Fundamentalism Full Description:The quasi-religious belief that markets are not just efficient, but morally superior and self-correcting. It posits that the market is the ultimate arbiter of value and that any interference with market logic is inherently harmful and inefficient. Market Fundamentalism is the ideological core that sustains neoliberal policymaking. It extends the logic of the market into non-economic spheres, arguing that schools, hospitals, prisons, and even environmental protection function best when run like businesses competing for profit. Critical Perspective:This worldview ignores the existence of “market failures” and externalities (like pollution). By assuming the market is always right, it justifies the erosion of democracy; if the market is the perfect decision-maker, then democratic oversight is merely “red tape.” It reduces society to a collection of consumers rather than a community of citizens.
Read more:

The belief that markets are self-correcting and morally superior to state intervention. This conviction underpins much neoliberal policymaking and continues to shape public debate about economic justice.

Human Capital TheoryHuman Capital Theory Full Description:An economic concept that reframes human beings not as workers or citizens, but as capital investments. It views education, health, and skills solely as assets to be managed by the individual to maximize their own economic productivity and market value. Human Capital Theory is the internalization of neoliberalism into the self. It suggests that individuals are “entrepreneurs of themselves.” In this view, poverty is not a structural failing of the system, but a personal failure of the individual to “invest” properly in their own skills or marketability. Critical Perspective:This theory creates a profound shift in social relations. It justifies the privatization of education and healthcare (since these are personal investments, the individual should pay for them, not the state). It leads to the “gig economy” mindset, where all of life becomes a hustle, and the burden of economic risk is shifted entirely from the corporation and the state onto the isolated individual.
Read more:

The view that education, skills, and knowledge are forms of economic capital. Popularized under neoliberalism, it reframes individuals as entrepreneurs of themselves, responsible for investing in their own productivity.

 

The Intellectual Foundations

To comprehend the sweeping influence of neoliberalism, it’s crucial to start with its intellectual architects. The articles in this section unpack the foundational ideas of thinkers like Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, whose theories provided the blueprint for a new economic world order.

The Historical Ascent of a Global Doctrine

The journey of neoliberalism from a fringe intellectual movement to a dominant global ideology is a compelling story. These articles trace its historical trajectory, from its conceptual beginnings in the wake of the Great Depression to its golden era in the late 20th century, examining its implementation and adaptation across different political and economic landscapes.

Neoliberalism in Practice: Global Case Studies

How were neoliberal principles translated into policy around the world? This section provides case studies that illuminate the diverse and often contentious application of neoliberal reforms in different national and international contexts.

Critiques and Consequences

The legacy of neoliberalism is far from settled. While proponents point to its role in fostering globalization and economic growth, critics highlight its contribution to rising inequality, the erosion of public services, and financial instability.[5][7] The articles below explore these critical perspectives and the significant social and economic consequences attributed to the neoliberal era.

A Timeline of Neoliberal ideas, politics and economics

Timeline: The Rise and Evolution of Neoliberalism

  • 1930s – The Intellectual Origins
    In reaction to the Great Depression and the rise of state planning, economists such as Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises advocate for market liberalization and warn against excessive government control. The term “neoliberalism” first appears among European thinkers seeking a middle ground between laissez-faire liberalism and state intervention.
  • 1944–1947 – Foundational Texts and Debates
    Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom (1944) argues that central planning leads to tyranny. In 1947, the Mont Pelerin SocietyMont Pelerin Society Full Description:An exclusive international organization founded by Friedrich Hayek and others to combat the rise of state planning and social democracy. It served as the primary intellectual incubator for neoliberal thought, playing a long-term strategic role in shifting global economic consensus. The Mont Pelerin Society was the “thought collective” behind the neoliberal counter-revolution. Established when free-market ideas were politically marginalized, it brought together economists, philosophers, and historians to refine and propagate individualist economic theories. Critical Perspective:Critically, this group exemplifies the “long game” of ideology. They understood that to change policy, they first had to change the intellectual climate. By building a network of think tanks and academic departments, they successfully waited for a crisis (stagflation) to present their pre-packaged ideas as the only viable solution, effectively manufacturing a new “common sense” that favored the elite.
    Read more     is established by Hayek to promote free-market ideas and resist collectivist economics, marking the organized intellectual birth of neoliberalism.
  • 1950s–1960s – Ideas in the Academic Margins
    Neoliberal thought remains intellectually active but politically marginal. Milton Friedman and other Chicago School economists refine theories on monetary policy, market efficiency, and limited government intervention, challenging postwar Keynesian consensus.
  • 1971–1973 – The Breakdown of the Bretton Woods Order
    The collapse of fixed exchange rates, stagflationStagflation Full Description:A portmanteau of “stagnation” and “inflation,” describing a period of high unemployment coupled with rising prices. This economic crisis in the industrialized West shattered faith in the post-war order and provided the “window of opportunity” for neoliberalism to ascend. Stagflation was the crisis that Keynesian economics could not explain or fix. Triggered in part by oil shocks, it created a situation where traditional state spending only fueled inflation without creating jobs. This failure paralyzed the political left and allowed the neoliberal right to step in with radical new solutions focused on breaking unions and shrinking the money supply. Critical Perspective:Naomi Klein and other critics view this moment as the first major application of the “Shock Doctrine.” The crisis was used to justify painful structural reforms—such as crushing labor power and slashing social spending—that would have been politically impossible during times of stability., and the 1973 oil crisis undermine faith in Keynesian economic management, creating fertile ground for neoliberal solutions centering on deregulation, privatization, and monetary discipline.
  • Late 1970s – Political Ascendancy
    Neoliberal ideas gain political traction. In the United Kingdom, Margaret Thatcher rises to power (1979), pursuing privatization and curbing trade unions. In the United States, Ronald Reagan’s election (1980) brings tax cuts, deregulation, and monetarist policies into mainstream governance.
  • 1980s – Global Diffusion through Institutions
    International organizations such as the IMF and World Bank adopt neoliberal policy frameworks known as the Washington Consensus. Structural Adjustment Programs impose privatization, fiscal austerity, and trade liberalization on developing countries.
  • Late 1980s–1990s – Triumphalism after the Cold War
    The fall of the Soviet Union cements neoliberal capitalism as the dominant global economic model. Market reforms spread through Latin America, Eastern Europe, and parts of Asia. Globalization accelerates, driven by deregulated finance and trade liberalization.
  • 1990s–2000s – Financialization and Expansion
    Deregulated financial markets become central to economic growth strategies. Clinton’s “Third Way” and Blair’s “New Labour” blend market mechanisms with social policy, institutionalizing neoliberal norms across political lines.
  • 2008 – Global Financial Crisis
    The collapse of major financial institutions exposes the fragility of deregulated markets. Governments intervene to stabilize economies, sparking renewed debate over neoliberalism’s social and systemic costs.
  • 2010s – Backlash and Reassessment
    Rising inequality, austerity policies, and populist movements challenge neoliberal orthodoxy. Scholars and policymakers question the moral legitimacy and sustainability of market fundamentalism.
  • 2020s – The Era of Post-Neoliberal Uncertainty
    Economic shocks from the COVID-19 pandemic prompt expanded state intervention and revived discussions of industrial policy, social welfare, and regulation. Commentators debate whether these developments signal the decline, adaptation, or transformation of neoliberalism.

Subscribe to the Explaining History Podcast

All new post in your inbox.