The Corrective MovementCorrective Movement The bloodless coup of 13 November 1970 in which Hafez al-Assad seized power in Syria, removing the Jadid government and becoming Prime Minister, then President. Assad described it as a ‘corrective movement’ within Ba’athism rather than a coup. By 1970, Hafez al-Assad had been manoeuvring against the radical Ba’athist Salah Jadid for several years. The two men represented genuinely different visions: Jadid was an ideological Ba’athist who prioritised party organisation and socialist transformation; Assad was a pragmatist who believed power resided in military force and was uninterested in ideological purity. The 1967 war, in which Syria lost the Golan Heights under Jadid’s direction, had gravely damaged the regime’s legitimacy; a further crisis in September 1970, when Jadid dispatched Syrian tanks into Jordan to support the PLO against King Hussein without consulting Assad (then Defence Minister), gave Assad the pretext he needed. He refused to provide air cover, the intervention failed, and Assad moved against Jadid in November. The takeover was arranged within the party and military structures Assad controlled, with no street violence or popular mobilisation. Jadid spent the rest of his life imprisoned; Assad ruled Syria for thirty years, until his death in 2000. The Corrective Movement established the template for what followed: a state whose institutions existed to serve a single man’s survival, managed through a fragmented security apparatus, a penetrating party network, and the strategic deployment of communal loyalty. The Corrective Movement is significant less as an event than as a method. Assad did not seize power through mass mobilisation, military invasion, or assassination but through patient institutional capture — controlling the key military units and intelligence positions that made the existing government’s removal risk-free for those who executed it. This method had a profound influence on how he subsequently constructed his own state: if the lesson of 1970 was that institutional positions determine political outcomes, then the system Assad built was designed to ensure that no one could ever occupy the same positions relative to him that he had occupied relative to Jadid. The multiplication of competing security services, the deliberate cultivation of communal loyalty in the praetorian units, and the exclusion of potentially threatening figures from positions of coercive power all flowed from this foundational experience. (al-Haraka al-Tashihiyya) was the name given by Hafez al-Assad to his bloodless coup of 13 November 1970, which removed his rival Salah Jadid from power and established Assad’s own presidency. The term “Corrective” was deliberately chosen to signal continuity with the Ba’ath revolution of 1963 rather than a break with it: Assad was presenting himself not as a coup-maker but as a Ba’athist leader correcting the errors of the Jadid period. The political differences between Assad and Jadid were real. Jadid was an austere ideological Ba’athist who had subordinated the military to civilian party control and pursued a radical socialist programme that alienated Syria’s private sector and merchant classes. Assad, as Defence Minister, had spent the Jadid years methodically reversing that subordination and building a power base that, by November 1970, left him in control of the armed forces, the air force, and the key security services. When he moved against Jadid, there was effectively no resistance. Jadid was arrested and spent the remaining twenty-three years of his life in Mezze prison without trial. Assad’s Corrective Movement inaugurated the three-decade rule that shaped modern Syria, establishing the security state, the praetorian military formations, and the system of managed patronage and surveillance that would endure until 2024.
Reading time:
Get the weekly analysis
One piece every week connecting current events to their historical roots — free, every Tuesday.
Subscribe free →Paid tier also available — deeper dives, full archive, essay guides.

Explaining History Podcast
For more than a decade, the Explaining History Podcast has helped listeners around the world make sense of modern history. What began in 2012 as a simple experiment—short, accessible episodes explaining major historical events—has grown into a long-running library of carefully researched, thoughtful explorations of the 20th and 21st centuries.
If this was useful, there’s more where it came from.
Every week I publish one piece connecting a current event to its historical roots — free, every Tuesday. Paid subscribers get two additional deeper dives and full archive access.
Subscribe to Explaining History →
Leave a Reply