If StalinStalin Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin (18 December 1878 – 5 March 1953) was a Soviet politician, dictator and revolutionary who led the Soviet Union from 1924 until his death in 1953. Read More’s First Five Year Plan was an economic revolution, then forced collectivization was its brutal engine—a campaign of state terror that fundamentally reshaped Soviet society and left millions dead. While official propaganda touted the modernization of agriculture, historians like Robert Conquest, Sheila Fitzpatrick, and Timothy Snyder have revealed the grim reality: a deliberate war against the peasantry that served as the foundation for Stalin’s industrial dreams.
The Ideological Battlefield: Why the Peasantry Had to be “Liquidated”
By 1928, Stalin faced what he called the “grain crisis”—peasants were withholding crops from the market, as prices were unfavorable. For Stalin and his allies, this wasn’t an economic problem but a political one. The independent-minded peasant, particularly the more successful kulak (a term increasingly applied to any resisting peasant), represented a capitalist threat to the socialist state.
As historian Sheila Fitzpatrick notes in Stalin’s Peasants, the party saw the countryside as “backward” and “petty-bourgeois,” an alien territory that resisted Soviet control. The goal of collectivization, therefore, was not merely economic efficiency but the complete “liquidation of the kulaks as a class” and the extension of state power into every village.
The Mechanics of Terror: Dekulakization and State Violence
The policy unfolded with systematic brutality, a process chillingly documented by Robert Conquest in The Harvest of Sorrow.
Dekulakization: The Opening Salvo
In 1929, Stalin gave the order to “eliminate the kulaks.” This triggered dekulakization—the state-sanctioned destruction of millions of peasant families. They were categorized as:
· Category 1: To be immediately arrested and executed as “counter-revolutionaries.”
· Category 2: To be exiled to remote, uninhabitable regions like Siberia or Kazakhstan with only what they could carry.
· Category 3: To be stripped of their property and relocated to poor land within their region.
As Timothy Snyder outlines in Bloodlands, this was not a spontaneous outburst of violence but a bureaucratic process. Party activists, often young urban communists, arrived in villages with quotas for how many “kulaks” to identify, leading to arbitrary accusations and the settling of old scores.
The Creation of the Kolkhoz
With the most successful farmers murdered or deported, the remaining peasants were terrorized into joining the collective farm, or kolkhoz. Here, they were forced to surrender their land, livestock, and tools to state ownership. Peasants responded with one of the few acts of resistance available to them: the mass slaughter of their own animals. Between 1929 and 1933, millions of horses, cattle, sheep, and pigs were killed—a devastating blow to Soviet agriculture from which it would take decades to recover.
The Man-Made Famine: The HolodomorHolodomor
Short Description (Excerpt):The man-made terror-famine of 1932–1933 that killed millions of Ukrainians. While famine affected other parts of the USSR, in Ukraine it was engineered by the state through impossible grain quotas and the closure of borders to prevent starving peasants from seeking food.
Full Description:Holodomor (meaning “death by hunger”) represents the darkest consequence of collectivization. When Ukrainian peasants failed to meet grain procurement quotas, the state seized all food stocks, blocked villages, and criminalized the possession of even a few stalks of wheat (“The Law of Spikelets”).
Critical Perspective:Historians increasingly view this not merely as a policy failure, but as an act of genocide designed to crush Ukrainian nationalism. Stalin feared that a rebellious Ukraine could destabilize the Soviet Union. Hunger was weaponized to break the spirit of the peasantry and destroy the social basis of Ukrainian independence.
Read more
The most catastrophic consequence was the famine of 1932-33. Conquest’s seminal work, The Harvest of Sorrow, was instrumental in bringing this tragedy to the world’s attention, arguing it was a deliberate act of terror.
The sequence was brutal:
- Impossible Quotas: The state set impossibly high grain procurement quotas, demanding every last kernel of seed grain.
- The Seizure of Food: Brigades swept through villages, confiscating not just grain but all available food, leaving peasants to starve.
- Legal Blockade: The August 1932 “Law of Spikelets” made it a capital offense to take even a handful of grain from a field. Meanwhile, borders of Ukraine and the Kuban region were sealed, preventing the starving from searching for food.
The famine hit Ukraine—the USSR’s breadbasket—with particular ferocity. Snyder and other scholars characterize the Holodomor (“death by hunger”) as a deliberate act of political terror aimed at crushing Ukrainian national identity and peasant resistance simultaneously. An estimated 4 to 5 million people starved to death in the Ukrainian SSR alone.
Historians’ Perspectives: Understanding the Motives
The scholarship on collectivization reveals a nuanced debate about Stalin’s intentions and the nature of the suffering.
· Robert Conquest’s “Deliberate Famine” Thesis: Conquest argued that the famine was a conscious tool of terror and national oppression, a genocide against the Ukrainian people. His work was pivotal in establishing the totalitarian model of Stalin’s regime, where terror was the central operating principle.
· Sheila Fitzpatrick’s Social History: Fitzpatrick, while not denying the terror, has focused more on the social transformation. In Everyday Stalinism, she examines how collectivization was a “Soviet civil war” against the peasantry that successfully broke their traditional way of life, creating a new, subservient collective farm peasant and enabling the state to extract the resources needed for crash industrialization.
· Timothy Snyder’s “Bloodlands” Framework: Snyder places the famine within the broader geography of mass killing between Stalin and Hitler. He emphasizes that the famine was not a natural disaster but a “political mass murder” made possible by the state’s seizure of the food supply and its use of hunger as a weapon against groups it deemed politically undesirable.
The Result: A Subjugated Countryside
By 1934, the battle was won. Over 90% of peasant households had been forced into kolkhozes. The human cost was staggering:
· Millions dead from famine.
· Millions more deported to the GulagGulag Full Description:The government agency that administered the vast network of forced labor camps. Far more than just a prison system, it was a central component of the Soviet economy, using slave labor to extract resources from the most inhospitable regions of the country. The Gulag system institutionalized political repression. Millions of “enemies of the people”—ranging from political dissidents and intellectuals to petty criminals—were arrested and transported to camps to work in mining, timber, and construction.
Critical Perspective:Critically, the Gulag was an economic necessity for the Stalinist system. The “Economic Miracle” of the Soviet Union relied heavily on this reservoir of unpaid, coerced labor to complete dangerous infrastructure projects that free labor would not undertake. It signifies the ultimate reduction of the human being to a unit of production, to be worked until exhaustion and then replaced.
Read more, where they provided the forced labour for many Five Year Plan projects.
· The destruction of the independent peasant and the creation of a state-controlled agricultural system that would remain inefficient for decades.
Forced collectivization was the brutal, indispensable foundation of Stalin’s industrial leap. It provided the grain exports to fund foreign machinery and freed up labor for the cities and construction sites. But as the work of Conquest, Fitzpatrick, and Snyder illuminates, its primary achievement was the total subjugation of Soviet society to the will of the state, at a cost of human life that remains almost unimaginable.
Explore our full resource hub on the Five Year Plans here
Leave a Reply to The Soviet Industrial Revolution: How the Five Year Plans Built a Superpower – Explaining History PodcastCancel reply