In Pakistani politics, few names carry the weight of the Bhutto dynasty. It is a name that conjures images of mass rallies, socialist ideas, constitutional triumph, judicial murder, and assassination. The story of the Bhutto family and the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) they lead is not merely a political history; it is a central, paradoxical strand in the DNA of modern Pakistan itself. The PPP emerged as the most significant civilian challenge to the military-bureaucratic establishment, a party that fundamentally expanded political participation and gave a powerful voice to the marginalized poor. Yet, its legacy is profoundly ambiguous. This essay will argue that while the Bhuttos and the PPP championed a populist, social-democratic vision that reshaped the political landscape, their trajectory has been ultimately constrained by the twin forces of tragic personal destiny and their own internal contradictions—including authoritarian tendencies, allegations of corruption, and an enduring dependence on dynastic politicsDynastic Politics
Full Description:A feature of Pakistan’s civilian democracy where political power is concentrated within specific families (most notably the Bhuttos and Sharifs), passed down from parent to child like a feudal inheritance. Dynastic Politics dominates the electoral landscape. Political parties function less as ideological institutions and more as family enterprises. Loyalty is owed to the “house” rather than to a set of principles. This system relies on patronage networks where voters support a local strongman or family in exchange for protection and resources.
Critical Perspective:This structure mimics the feudalism of the countryside. It prevents the rise of meritocratic leadership, as the top positions are reserved for blood relatives. Critics argue that this weakens democracy, as parties become personality cults unable to reform internally, making them easy targets for the military to manipulate or dismantle.
Read more that has limited their ability to enact lasting, structural democratic change.
The Founder: Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and the Politics of Populist Promise (1967-1979)
The rise of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was as meteoric as his fall was tragic. A wealthy, Western-educated landowner from Sindh, he served in various ministerial positions under President Ayub Khan but broke with the regime following the 1965 war with India, which he perceived as a capitulation. In 1967, he founded the Pakistan Peoples Party, unleashing a new and potent force in Pakistani politics. The PPP’s slogan, “Roti, Kapra, Makan” (Bread, Clothing, Shelter), was a masterstroke of populist rhetoric. It spoke directly to the impoverished masses—peasants, workers, and the urban poor—who had been largely excluded from the country’s political and economic life, which was dominated by a nexus of industrialists, feudal lords, and generals.
The 1970 general elections were a revelation. Capitalizing on the public’s disillusionment with the status quo, Bhutto’s PPP secured a landslide in West Pakistan, while Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s Awami League won in East Pakistan. The ensuing political crisis and the 1971 war that led to Bangladesh’s secession brought Bhutto to power as President, and later, Prime Minister of a shattered, demoralized nation. His tenure (1971-1977) was a period of intense, contradictory activity. On one hand, he oversaw the drafting of the 1973 Constitution, a landmark consensus document that established a parliamentary framework and remains the bedrock of Pakistani constitutional law. He launched a sweeping program of nationalization, taking over major industries, banks, and educational institutions in an effort to break the power of the “22 families” that controlled the economy. Most significantly, he initiated Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program, framing it as a national imperative to secure the country against a now-dominant India.
On the other hand, the populist democrat revealed a deeply authoritarian streak. He systematically undermined political opponents, cultivated a personality cult, and used the state apparatus to suppress dissent, most brutally in Balochistan, where a military operation ignited an insurgency that continues to simmer. Furthermore, in a bid to outflank religious parties, he declared the Ahmadiyya community non-Muslims in 1974, a cynical concession to Islamism that would have lasting damaging consequences. Bhutto’s rule demonstrated the central paradox of his project: he sought to empower the people through a top-down, often autocratic, structure that concentrated power in his own hands.
The Hanging and the Heir: From Military Dictatorship to Democratic Restoration
Bhutto’s downfall was as dramatic as his rise. The 1977 elections were widely seen as rigged by the PPP, triggering a mass opposition movement. The army, under General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, seized power in a coup. After a controversial trial on charges of conspiring to murder a political opponent, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was hanged on April 4, 1979. The execution was a political assassination, ordered by a military dictator intent on decapitating the most powerful civilian challenge to its rule. In death, Bhutto was transformed from a flawed leader into a potent political martyr. The “Bhutto myth”—of the leader who gave his life for the people—became the PPP’s most powerful asset, an emotional bond that would sustain the party for decades.
The mantle of leadership fell to his daughter, Benazir Bhutto. Forced into exile, she became the world’s most famous political prisoner and the symbol of resistance to Zia’s repressive regime. Her return to Pakistan in 1986 drew millions of supporters, confirming her status as the heir to the Bhutto legacy. This period completed the party’s transformation from a broad-based ideological movement into a vehicle for the Bhutto dynasty. The party’s slogan became “Jiye Bhutto!” (Long Live Bhutto!), and its identity became inextricably linked with the survival and restoration of the Bhutto family.
The Daughter’s Turn: Benazir Bhutto and the Challenges of Governance (1988-1999)
Following Zia’s death in 1988, Benazir Bhutto led the PPP to victory, becoming the first woman elected to lead a Muslim-majority nation. She was a global icon—young, charismatic, and Western-educated, representing a modern, democratic alternative to military rule. However, her two non-consecutive terms as Prime Minister (1988-1990 and 1993-1996) were plagued by immense challenges and controversies.
Her governments operated under the constant, overbearing shadow of the military establishment and a powerful presidency, which retained the power to dismiss elected governments. She struggled to translate her populist promises into effective governance, and her administrations became synonymous with allegations of rampant corruption, particularly aimed at her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, who was widely dubbed “Mr. Ten Percent.” While she made strides in areas like media liberalization and championing women’s rights, the core PPP agenda of social justice and economic empowerment for the poor remained largely unfulfilled. Her governments were dismissed twice on charges of corruption and mismanagement, cementing a narrative of the PPP as a party that could win elections but failed at governance. Benazir’s legacy is thus a dual one: a trailblazer for women and democracy, and a leader whose tenures were marked by unfulfilled potential and a failure to dismantle the entrenched power structures she inherited.
The Martyr’s Return and the Second Assassination
After years of self-exile, Benazir Bhutto returned to Pakistan in 2007 under a US-brokered understanding with military ruler General Pervez Musharraf, aiming to transition the country back to democracy. Her return rally in Karachi was targeted by a suicide bomb attack, which she narrowly survived. However, just weeks before the scheduled 2008 elections, after a campaign rally in Rawalpindi, she was assassinated. The murder sent shockwaves around the world and plunged Pakistan into a deep crisis.
In a wave of sympathy, the PPP, now led by her widower Asif Ali Zardari, won the general elections. Zardari, a controversial figure, became President. His tenure (2008-2013) was a masterclass in political survival. He oversaw a fragile coalition government and, most importantly, presided over the passage of the historic 18th Amendment to the constitution. This landmark reform rolled back the president’s dictatorial powers, restored the parliamentary spirit of the 1973 Constitution, and devolved significant powers to the provinces. It stands as one of the PPP’s most enduring and positive constitutional achievements. However, his presidency was also marred by persistent allegations of corruption, a deteriorating security situation, and a struggling economy, leaving the party’s reputation battered.
The PPP in the 21st Century: Dynastic Decline or Political Evolution?
In the years since 2013, the PPP has experienced a dramatic contraction of its political base. Once a national party, its influence has largely receded to its Sindhi heartland, where it governs the province but faces criticism for poor governance, corruption, and the failure to maintain law and order in Karachi. Leadership has passed to Benazir and Zardari’s son, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, an Oxford-educated scion who embodies the party’s dynastic tradition.
Bilawal’s challenge is immense. He must rejuvenate the party’s national appeal, particularly among a younger, urban demographic that is increasingly skeptical of dynastic politics and the old guard surrounding him. He must reconcile the PPP’s founding socialist rhetoric with the demands of a 21st-century globalized economy and navigate a political landscape still dominated by the military establishment and powerful new challengers like Imran Khan’s PTI. The central criticism of the modern PPP is that it has become a vehicle for entitlement and patronage, its revolutionary spirit diluted by its long incumbency in Sindh and its failure to consistently uphold the democratic and social justice principles it professes.
Conclusion: The Unfulfilled Promise
The story of the Bhutto dynasty and the Pakistan Peoples Party is a Shakespearean drama woven into the fabric of Pakistan. It is a story of immense promise and profound tragedy. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto unleashed a political awakening among the masses and gave Pakistan its most enduring constitution, but his authoritarianism and the circumstances of his death left a legacy of polarization. Benazir Bhutto broke barriers as a female leader and kept the flame of democracy alive during dark times, but her governments failed to deliver transformative change and were clouded by allegations of corruption.
The PPP’s greatest achievement is its enduring demonstration that popular, civilian-led politics is possible in Pakistan. It has been a crucial vehicle for the expression of popular will against military rule. Yet, its greatest failure may be its inability to transcend its own dynastic nature and the politics of patronage. The party that promised “Roti, Kapra, Makan” has, for many of its supporters, become synonymous with the very elite politics it was created to combat. The Bhutto story, therefore, mirrors the broader struggle of Pakistani democracy itself: a persistent, courageous, yet deeply flawed effort to establish the sovereignty of the people, forever shadowed by tragedy and the entrenched power of the state it seeks to tame.
Further Reading:
· Bhutto, Benazir. Daughter of Destiny: An Autobiography. Simon & Schuster, 1989.
· Wolpert, Stanley. Zulfi Bhutto of Pakistan: His Life and Times. Oxford University Press, 1993.
· Ziring, Lawrence. Pakistan: At the Crosscurrent of History. Oneworld Publications, 2003.
· Jones, Owen Bennett. Pakistan: Eye of the Storm. Yale University Press, 2002.
· Hussain, Zahid. The Scorpion’s Tail: The Relentless Rise of Islamic Militants in Pakistan. Free Press, 2010.
· Jalal, Ayesha. The State of Martial Rule: The Origins of Pakistan’s Political Economy of Defence. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
· Pakistan Peoples Party. Foundation Documents and Manifestos.
Leave a Reply